Free U.S. Shipping on orders over $20.00


New World Library Unshelved

New World Library Unshelved

Positive news and inspiring views from the New World Library community

Friday, August 26, 2011
Curious about the ethics behind Apple CEO Steve Job's resignation? Find out what Bruce Weinstein, host of "Ask the Ethics Guy!" has to say

Does Steve Jobs have an ethical responsibility to disclose the nature of his illness? Here’s what Bruce Weinstein, author of the upcoming book Ethical Intelligence: 5 Principles for Untangling Your Toughest Problems at Work and Beyond, shared with ABC News regarding the resignation of Apple CEO Steve Jobs:

Bruce shared additional observations in his January 2011 Bloomberg Businessweek article titled “How Truthful Must CEO Steve Jobs Be?” Here’s what he said:

In the wake of Steve Jobs’s announcement on Jan. 17 that he would be taking a new medical leave, two ethical questions arise. First, as chief executive of Apple, does Jobs have the same right to privacy that others do? And if this right is a limited one, how much is Jobs ethically obligated to disclose to stakeholders about what is going on?

I’ll explain why Jobs’s right to privacy is not absolute and why the right thing for him to do is to reveal details about his medical condition that are relevant to his leadership abilities.

1. Role-specific duties exist. People have ethical obligations by virtue of the positions they hold. These obligations don’t necessarily apply to others. For example, physicians have a role-specific duty to render first aid to strangers. The roots of the word professional mean “to make a public declaration.” Physicians declare that they are of service to others.

2. The CEO of a public company has role-specific duties to stakeholders. Whether you create a company from scratch — as Steve Jobs did — or step into the top position, your leadership brings with it responsibilities as well as perks. The perks are obvious: a hefty salary, influence in business and beyond, and in Jobs’s case, respect and admiration around the world. The price for these perks includes an obligation to do things one might not like to do, such as disclose to stakeholders things about yourself that pertain to the successful operation of the company.

3. Stakeholders have an interest in the CEO’s health. By “interest,” I don’t mean a morbid curiosity, but rather a right to know whether or not the captain of the ship can physically perform the work expected.

4. Jobs’s medical condition, his treatment options, and his prognosis all fall within the rightful purview of stakeholders. Reality TV shows, entertainment blogs, and 24-hour cable news networks have all but obliterated the line between one’s professional and personal lives. The line was thin to begin with: Rock Hudson and Freddie Mercury were both robbed of dignity in their final days by a ruthless press corps that speculated (correctly, as it turned out) that each was dying of HIV/AIDS.

Celebrity alone should not carry with it public access to the intimate, intensely personal details of someone’s private life. But Steve Jobs’s celebrity fits into a different category from that of entertainment stars. His health can and does affect how well his company functions. Someone as hands-on as Jobs may not be able to fulfill his duties while wrestling with a life-threatening illness.

Jobs’s current leave of absence for medical reasons is his third one in seven years. He announced he had pancreatic cancer (for which he underwent surgery) in 2004, and in 2009 he received a liver transplant.

5. Steve Jobs occupies a rare position in business. “Perhaps more than any other chief executive,” wrote Miguel Helft in the New York Times, “he is seen as inseparable from his company’s success.” What other company can generate the top news story of the day whenever it announces the release of a new product? Consumers buy an iPhone, iPad, or MacBook (like the one I’m writing this article on) largely because they know and trust Steve Jobs’s commitment to excellence. This dedication should apply not only to making great gadgets but also to treating with respect the people who buy and invest in these technological marvels.

It is understandable why Jobs would tell Apple employees, “[M]y family and I would deeply appreciate respect for our privacy,” and although information about Jobs’s family shouldn’t be a matter of public record, his own right to privacy is limited by what he owes to Apple stakeholders.

6. Business ethics cut both ways. I’ve been focusing on what Steve Jobs should do as Apple’s leader. At the same time, business ethics should refer not only to what businesses owe stakeholders but also to what stakeholders owe businesses. We ought to keep in mind that Steve Jobs isn’t just a CEO; he is a human being. What’s called for right now, from everyone who cares about the future of Apple, isn’t just concern about the company but also compassion for its leader. (It’s worth noting that compassion literally means “to suffer with.”)

As chief executive of a publicly traded company, Steve Jobs has a role-specific duty to inform stakeholders of anything likely to affect how he runs the organization. This includes his current medical condition and prognosis, his treatment options, and how well he is doing as this ordeal progresses. Stakeholders — and everyone else — should show compassion for this visionary genius who has enriched our lives in so many ways.

Dr. Bruce Weinstein is the host of “Ask the Ethics Guy!” on Bloomberg Businessweek online and gives keynote addresses on ethics and leadership to businesses, schools, and nonprofit organizations across the country. His new book, Ethical Intelligence, will be published in October by New World Library. His website is






May 2019 (3)
April 2019 (4)
March 2019 (4)
February 2019 (4)
January 2019 (5)
December 2018 (3)
November 2018 (5)
October 2018 (4)
September 2018 (4)
August 2018 (4)
July 2018 (4)
June 2018 (5)
May 2018 (7)
April 2018 (5)
March 2018 (5)
February 2018 (5)
January 2018 (5)
December 2017 (3)
November 2017 (6)
October 2017 (6)
September 2017 (6)
August 2017 (6)
July 2017 (5)
June 2017 (7)
May 2017 (6)
April 2017 (6)
March 2017 (8)
February 2017 (5)
January 2017 (5)
December 2016 (6)
November 2016 (8)
October 2016 (6)
September 2016 (7)
August 2016 (6)
July 2016 (6)
June 2016 (7)
May 2016 (7)
April 2016 (6)
March 2016 (7)
February 2016 (6)
January 2016 (6)
December 2015 (4)
November 2015 (7)
October 2015 (7)
September 2015 (6)
August 2015 (7)
July 2015 (9)
June 2015 (9)
May 2015 (8)
April 2015 (9)
March 2015 (9)
February 2015 (8)
January 2015 (8)
December 2014 (7)
November 2014 (7)
October 2014 (9)
September 2014 (9)
August 2014 (8)
July 2014 (10)
June 2014 (8)
May 2014 (9)
April 2014 (8)
March 2014 (9)
February 2014 (9)
January 2014 (7)
December 2013 (7)
November 2013 (4)
October 2013 (5)
September 2013 (4)
August 2013 (4)
July 2013 (3)
June 2013 (3)
May 2013 (4)
April 2013 (4)
March 2013 (3)
February 2013 (3)
January 2013 (2)
December 2012 (4)
November 2012 (4)
October 2012 (5)
September 2012 (2)
August 2012 (3)
July 2012 (2)
June 2012 (3)
May 2012 (2)
April 2012 (3)
March 2012 (5)
February 2012 (3)
January 2012 (4)
December 2011 (4)
November 2011 (3)
October 2011 (4)
September 2011 (5)
August 2011 (4)
July 2011 (2)
June 2011 (3)
May 2011 (3)
April 2011 (4)
March 2011 (4)
February 2011 (3)
January 2011 (1)
December 2010 (3)
November 2010 (3)
October 2010 (4)
September 2010 (2)
August 2010 (4)
July 2010 (4)
June 2010 (2)
May 2010 (4)
April 2010 (5)
March 2010 (5)
February 2010 (1)